Quigley v. City Court of the City of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
The issue in this appeal from a special action is whether the superior court exercised the proper standard of review of the city magistrate’s dismissal of a prosecution without prejudice.
Petitioner was charged in the city court with petty theft. A pretrial conference was held on July 23, 1981, and the state disclosed its witnesses. The state, however, did not include the name of a Mr. Arnold, an accomplice who had already been convicted. Recognizing this error, the prosecutor had Mr. Arnold added to the witness list and a subpoena was issued for his attendance, but…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Belock v. State Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
3Cited by40 opinions
- Englert v. Carondelet Health NetworkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Willie G. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Torres v. North American Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Adrian E. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. SandovalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.