Legal Opinion

State v. Vasko

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 10, 1998No. 1 CA-CR 96-0429PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOSS, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Gary Jay Vasko (defendant) appeals from his convictions and sentences on seven drug-related charges. The only issue on appeal is whether, when defendant has neither alleged nor shown that he suffered prejudice, we must nonetheless reverse a conviction after the trial because the trial court violated defendant’s right to a speedy trial, pursuant to Rule 8, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure.

¶2 This appeal requires us to examine two well-established principles of law that appear to conflict when applied to the specific facts of this case, and to reconcile them to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. DessureaultArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. MurrayArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. SpreitzArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. ZuckArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State Ex Rel. Berger v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. State v. WassenaarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. State v. Paris-SheldonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Sensing v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Joshua J. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API