Legal Opinion
Quinn v. Cunningham
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 8, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-3339PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER & MEMORANDUM
KATZ, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 1995, upon consideration of the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, it is hereby ORDERED that the said motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
Facts
Plaintiff Lawrence G. Quinn is an inmate at the State Correctional Institution at Graterford. The defendants are four officials responsible for the management of the prison shoe plant.
The plaintiff, who is white, alleges that the defendants discriminated against him on the basis of race with respect to his work assignment. In March 1994, the plaintiff was the side…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Williams v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilson v. HornDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Booth v. KingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Bendy v. Ocean County JailCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Wilson v. ShannonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Bendy v. Ocean County JailCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.