Legal Opinion
Booth v. King
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 29, 2004No. 2:03-mj-00802PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
1. INTRODUCTION
Pro se prisoner plaintiff Timothy Booth (“Booth”) brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several employees or former employees of the Philadelphia Prison System (“PPS defendants”). 1 Booth alleges that while he was at PPS’s Curran Fromhold Correctional Facility (“CFCF”) and House of Corrections (“HOC”), PPS defendants violated his First, Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights under the United States Constitution. The court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case based on the existence of a federal…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Dickens v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2006
- DeBlasio v. PignoliCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Kantamanto v. KingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Glenn v. BaruaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Holland v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.