Singer v. Matto
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The defendants, Lawrence R. Matto and Helene F. Matto, appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their motion to reargue the award of sanctions to the plaintiff, Joel Singer, a plastic surgeon. The pro se defendants claim that the trial court improperly denied their motion to reargue1 the plaintiffs motion for costs and attorney’s fees in which they sought the opportunity to advance, through counsel, arguments not previously before the trial court and to develop an evidentiary record sufficient to allow the reviewing tribunal to evaluate those arguments.
*464The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Fiddelman v. RedmonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. KluczinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Tiber Holding Corp. v. GreenbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Dime Savings Bank v. CornagliaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Emerick v. KuhnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Keith E. Simpson Associates, Inc. v. RossConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- In re Todd G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999