Legal Opinion

Singer v. Matto

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 21, 1998No. AC 16957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LANDAU, J.

The defendants, Lawrence R. Matto and Helene F. Matto, appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their motion to reargue the award of sanctions to the plaintiff, Joel Singer, a plastic surgeon. The pro se defendants claim that the trial court improperly denied their motion to reargue1 the plaintiffs motion for costs and attorney’s fees in which they sought the opportunity to advance, through counsel, arguments not previously before the trial court and to develop an evidentiary record sufficient to allow the reviewing tribunal to evaluate those arguments.

*464The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. Fiddelman v. RedmonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. KluczinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Tiber Holding Corp. v. GreenbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. Dime Savings Bank v. CornagliaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Emerick v. KuhnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  2. Keith E. Simpson Associates, Inc. v. RossConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. In re Todd G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API