Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Kinzer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 29, 1916No. 4787PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Tillman County-; Prank Matthews, Judge. Action by Henry Kinzer against Charles Briggs. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

CLAY, C,.

Por convenience the plaintiff in error will be referred to as defendant, and the defendant in error as plaintiff, as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff moves for the dismissal of the appeal upon two grounds, viz: (1) That there was no notice of the settlement of the case-made; (2) that the case-made contains no recital that all the evidence is contained therein.

In passing upon the first ground of the motion we think it sufficient to say that the stipulation of counsel at page 75 of the record, which reads as follows: “And the said plaintiff waives the right to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Martin v. GassertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  2. Board of Commissioners v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. Wade v. GouldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  4. Wagner v. Sattley Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Sawyer & Austin Lumber Co. v. Champlain Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alexander v. First Nat. Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Seibold v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Murray v. BristowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API