Alexander v. First Nat. Bank of Duncan
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
This ease is before this court on motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the appeal.
The record is certified by the court clerk as a transcript. The errors complained of are not such as may be reviewed on a transcript. Charles v. Prentice, 88 Okla. 246, 212 Pac. 585.
The record contains no averment by way of recital that it contains all the proceedings and evidence or other matter in the action necessary to present the error complained of to the Supreme Court. Such an averment is necessary in an appeal by case-made. Briggs v. Kinzer, 59 Okla. 49, 158 Pac. 447, and cases therein cited. It…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Argentoes v. Fidelity Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Briggs v. KinzerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Charles v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by8 opinions
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. KitchenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Seibold v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Russell v. Motor Mtg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Sanderson v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Tingley v. TingleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.