Legal Opinion

Schweizer v. Elox Division of Colt Industries

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 11, 1976PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Conford, P. J. A. D.,

Temporarily Assigned. We are asked on this appeal to alter the construction of the employer-subrogation provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (N. J. S. A. 34:15-40) from that consistently understood and practically applied in this State by those concerned therewith over the years.

The act provides, expressly and without qualification, that the employer or his compensation carrier is subrogated to the injured employee’s cause of action in tort against the third-party tortfeasor to the extent of compensation payments made by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Ramos v. Browning Ferris Industries of South Jersey, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Arctic Structures, Inc. v. WedmoreAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Frazier v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  5. Midland Insurance v. ColatrellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API