Schweizer v. Elox Division of Colt Industries
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Conford, P. J. A. D.,
Temporarily Assigned. We are asked on this appeal to alter the construction of the employer-subrogation provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (N. J. S. A. 34:15-40) from that consistently understood and practically applied in this State by those concerned therewith over the years.
The act provides, expressly and without qualification, that the employer or his compensation carrier is subrogated to the injured employee’s cause of action in tort against the third-party tortfeasor to the extent of compensation payments made by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
3Cited by41 opinions
- Ramos v. Browning Ferris Industries of South Jersey, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Arctic Structures, Inc. v. WedmoreAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Frazier v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Midland Insurance v. ColatrellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.