Legal Opinion

American Bonding & Trust Co. v. Milstead

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 16, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Newport News, in an action of assumpsit, wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error was the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

This is a writ of error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Newport News, in an action brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, to recover certain damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of the breach of a promise and undertaking set forth in a certain contract in writing executed by one E. L. Herndon, with plaintiff in error as his surety, to guarantee to defendant in error the faithful performance of the duties of Herndon, as the deputy for defendant in error, sergeant of the city of Newport News.

The plaintiff in error refused to pay the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Union Central Life Ins. v. PollardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  2. Howe Machine Company v. . FarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Hoffman v. DickinsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Bostwick v. . Van VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Grubb v. BurfordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bannister v. Victoria Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Holladay v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
  3. Widder v. Eagle Research Group, Inc.Arlington County Circuit Court · 1991
  4. Mannix v. the Portland TelegramOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State Bank of Mora v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API