Legal Opinion

Kuchynski v. Ukryn

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 1, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

At the time that the plaintiff Antonina suffered her injuries, she and the plaintiff Paul had occupied the premises under the tenancy of the latter for thirteen years or more, during the last six of which the defendants had been owners and landlords. As far as appears, the tenant was in control of the premises, and there was no contract by the defendants to make repairs.

The evidence would justify a finding that at some indefinite time prior to the accident, the defendant Ukryn drove two nails into the foot of the post that supported the rail, apparently with the purpose of making the post…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bauer v. 141-149 Cedar Lane Holding Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Ronald A. Barrett v. Foster Grant Co., Inc., and Third-Party v. Transformer Service, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  3. Roesler v. Liberty Nat. Bank of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  4. Trull v. Town of ConwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  5. Flanders v. New Hampshire Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API