Ronald A. Barrett v. Foster Grant Co., Inc., and Third-Party v. Transformer Service, Inc., Third-Party
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Chief Judge.
In 1951 Foster Grant Co., a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business in Leominster, Massachusetts, hereinafter defendant, acquired, in situ, certain transformers from the Massachusetts Electric Company. Without alterations, it used these transformers to reduce a transmission voltage of 13,800 volts, the “high” side, to 550 volts, the “low” side, for its manufacturing operations. The transformers were oil cooled, and it was necessary, periodically, to change or recondition the oil. For three years after it acquired the transformers, defendant relied on…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
- Commonwealth v. CaritaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Leo Manzoli and Mary Ann Manzoli v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Spherex, Inc. v. Alexander Grant & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- LaBounty v. American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Donald E. Powers v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. McKie Lighter Co., Inc., Donald E. Powers v. McKie Lighter Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- Vittum v. New Hampshire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.