Legal Opinion

Flanders v. New Hampshire Savings Bank

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 22, 1939No. 3065PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

This is a case of a tenement orally hired with no agreement in the terms of hiring for either the landlord or the tenant to keep it in repair. Without more being shown the landlord had no duty to repair. The plaintiffs, however, make the claim that the evidence sufficed to show the existence of the duty under the theory of retained control.

It is argued that the evidence warranted a finding that the tenants of the adjoining tenement had the right to share in the use of the steps on which the intestate fell. This position is untenable. The only common use shown was for a playground for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bixby v. ThurberSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  2. Hunkins v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  3. Kuchynski v. UkrynSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sargent v. RossSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  2. Martel v. MaloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. Grochowski v. StewartSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
  4. Dunnington v. Thomas E. Jarrell Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Dunnington v. Thomas E. Jarrell Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API