Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. Francisco

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1920No. 22,151; No. 22,655PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeals from Rooks district court; Charles I. Sparks, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This appeal has been docketed two times. The notice of appeal has been filed two times, and was docketed each time.' There is but one action and but one appeal.

The plaintiff commenced this action, one in replevin, to recover a tractor engine from the defendant. The cause was tried by a jury, and at the close of the evidence the jury was directed to- return a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and judgment was rendered accordingly. The defendant appeals.

The defendant, on about June 15,1914, ordered a secondhand tractor engine from the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sleeper v. Bullen & DustinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  2. Emery v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. George v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Schmidt v. BenderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. Kimble v. BunnySupreme Court of Kansas · 1900

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Arensman v. KitchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  2. Clark v. Linley Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. Turner v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Frogge v. BelfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  5. Parkhurst v. Investors SyndicateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API