Legal Opinion

Emery v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 11, 1916No. 19,982PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from Washington district court; JOHN C. HOGIN, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The appellant, plaintiff below, sued the defendant on a promissory note. The defendant’s answer admitted the execution but denied the "delivery of the note, and alleged that it was only a memorandum of a gift, but that about a year after its execution it had been delivered by mistake along with some other papers. The appellant was the defendant’s father-in-law. We may infer that the reciprocal relation of paternal regard and filial respect which may have existed between the parties at the time of the alleged gift has changed. Hence this…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Laithe v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Mitchell v. MilhoanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  3. Hamilton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. Missouri Valley R. R. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  5. Fitzpatrick v. GebhartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Johnston Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  2. Cook v. DonnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. In Re Interest of LDNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. Brick v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API