Legal Opinion

Frogge v. Belford

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 12, 1949No. 37,610PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This is an action to recover damages for breach of contract. The plaintiffs appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to their evidence and a judgment for costs.

*75Owen W. Frogge and Fred Frogge, partners, doing business as Frogge Motor Company instituted this lawsuit by the filing of a petition containing two causes of action wherein they charged B. B. Belford, Mary Belford, L. R. Belford and Amos B. Zimmerman, partners, doing business as Belford Motors and engaged in business as general dealers for the sale of DeSoto and Plymouth…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arensman v. KitchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  2. Karr v. MoffettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Mckay v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Karr v. MoffettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. FranciscoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. James R. Baker v. The Penn Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  2. Brown v. BeckerditeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  3. Cherry v. JoyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  4. Hummel v. Wichita Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. Bloch v. FedakSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API