Legal Opinion

Harrison Machine Works v. Reigor

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1885No. Case No. 5262PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from Tarrant. Tried below before the Hon. A. M. Carter, Special Judge. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Willie, Chief Justice.

Eliza M. Hicks and J. Eeigor executed to Harrison & Co. two promissory notes each for $700, one payable *90January 1, 1879, and the other January 1, 1880, and each containing an agreement to the effect that a failure to pay that note when due should mature both notes.

This suit was commenced upon these two notes more than four years after the maturity of the one first falling due, and the statute of limitations having been pleaded, the question is: Was suit upon the last barred?

That the effect of the agreement was to authorize suit or give a right of action upon the last…

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. Gaddis v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Hallaway v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. San Antonio Real Estate Building & Loan Ass'n v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Owen v. City of EastlandTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. City Nat. Bank of Corpus Christi v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API