Legal Opinion

Pascual v. Carver

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1994No. 930257PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:

Danilo Pascual appeals the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Pascual claims he is entitled to habeas relief on the following grounds: (i) his trial counsel was ineffective, and (ii) he was inadequately represented on appeal. Pascual also challenges the constitutionality of section 78-12-31.1 of the Utah Code. That section imposes a three-month statute of limitations for bringing a petition for habeas relief. We affirm.

A jury convicted Pascual of criminal homicide, a first degree felony. On January 3, 1989, the district court sentenced Pascual to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Codianna v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Fernandez v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. MabeUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. PascualCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  5. Gerrish v. BarnesUtah Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Kell v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Rudolph v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Lucero v. KennardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
  5. Lucero v. KennardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API