Pascual v. Carver
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:
Danilo Pascual appeals the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Pascual claims he is entitled to habeas relief on the following grounds: (i) his trial counsel was ineffective, and (ii) he was inadequately represented on appeal. Pascual also challenges the constitutionality of section 78-12-31.1 of the Utah Code. That section imposes a three-month statute of limitations for bringing a petition for habeas relief. We affirm.
A jury convicted Pascual of criminal homicide, a first degree felony. On January 3, 1989, the district court sentenced Pascual to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Codianna v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Fernandez v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MabeUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. PascualCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- Gerrish v. BarnesUtah Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Kell v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Rudolph v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Lucero v. KennardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
- Lucero v. KennardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004