Legal Opinion

Rudolph v. Galetka

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 2002No. 20000218PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

{1 Plaintiff Henry L. Rudolph appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. We take jurisdiction over the appeal under sections 78-2-2@8)(J) and 78-22-8(2)(f) of the Utah Code.

12 The State initially charged Rudolph with aggravated burglary, aggravated sexual assault, and violation of a protective order. His first trial, at which he appeared pro se with stand-by counsel, ended with convictions of aggravated burglary and violation of a protective order but acquittal of aggravated sexual assault. After Rudolph appealed, this court summarily reversed and remanded the case…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Parsons v. BarnesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hurst v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. RudolphUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. WulffensteinUtah Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Allen v. FrielUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Taylor v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Myers v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Gardner v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Adams v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API