Lucero v. Kennard
Court of Appeals of Utah
1DissentJackson, Judge
¶ 15 I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion.
I. The District Court’s Jurisdiction to Hear a Petition for Extraordinary Relief
¶ 16 It is unquestionably true that a defendant’s right to appeal a justice court conviction to a district court for a trial de novo satisfies the various state and federal constitutional guarantees relating to due process and the right to appeal. See, e.g., North v. Russell, 427 U.S. 328, 337, 96 S.Ct. 2709, 2713, 49 L.Ed.2d 534 (1976); City of Monticello v. Christensen, 788 P.2d 513, 516 (Utah 1990). The question before us, however, is not one of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Iowa v. TovarSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- North v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. FramptonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.