Legal Opinion

Kell v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 2008No. 20070234PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

{1 Petitioner Troy Kell appeals the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. Specifically, Kell challenges the holding that some of his claims were procedurally barred under the Post-Conviction Remedies Act ("PCRA") because either they were previously raised on direct appeal or they could have been raised on direct appeal but were not. Additionally, Kell challenges the post-conviction court's entry of summary judgment in favor of the State on all claims that were not procedurally barred. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

[2 Troy Kell was convicted of murder and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Archuleta v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Gardner v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Kell v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Ross v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API