Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. Dollins
Supreme Court of Virginia
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtSpratley, J.
This is an action by Ethel O. Dollins to recover on a policy of automobile collision insurance issued by Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as Harleysville or defendant, damages caused to her automobile.
The facts are simple, clear and without material conflict.
On April 12, 1957, William C. Dollins, seventeen-year old son of Ethel O. Dollins, went to the office of Charlottesville Motors, an automobile dealer in Charlottesville, Virginia, with reference to the purchase of an automobile. Being a minor, his mother came into the conference and purchased in her name a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ayres v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Naify v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Ampy v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
- Wolonter v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Bowles v. RiceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
3Cited by22 opinions
- Central Surety & Insurance Corporation v. ElderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
- Hill v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. CrosswhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
- Town Crier, Inc. v. HumeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
- Bohreer v. Erie Ins. GroupDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.