Town Crier, Inc. v. Hume
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLIS, District Judge.
Background
An insurer’s duty to defend is unquestionably broader than its duty to indemnify. The limits of this broader duty are often difficult to discern. This case presents just such a question. More specifically, the question presented here is whether the issuer of a professional errors & omissions liability policy is obligated to defend an insured against claims of intentional tor-tious conduct where the policy excludes such claims.
Plaintiff Town Crier is a Virginia corporation engaged in the real estate business. Plaintiff Boehm is a real estate…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cheatle v. Rudd's Swimming Pool Supply Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Reisen v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. S. L. Nusbaum & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Johnson v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Richard C. Fuisz v. Selective Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Solers, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- AES CORP. v. Steadfast Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2012
- America Online, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
- Bohreer v. Erie Ins. GroupDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.