Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Tulare v. Andreas

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1928No. Docket No. 3437PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCK (G. F.), J., pro tem.

Replevin by the holder of a chattel mortgage to recover a crop of grapes grown on land the subject of an unrecorded agreement of sale between the defendant owner of the land and one Andreas. The crop mortgage in question was executed to the plaintiff by Andreas while Andreas was in possession of the land under his agreement of purchase from the defendant.

Defendant, relying upon certain provisions pertaining to the crops in the agreement of sale, alleges in his answer that he is the sole owner of the crops of grapes and that plaintiff acquired no interest therein by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Simpson v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Stockton Savings & Loan Society v. PurvisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. McDonough v. Russell-Miller Milling Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Killebrew v. . HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. McCloudIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Snipes v. Dexter Gin Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Yakoobian v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Federal Land Bank v. McCloudIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API