Legal Opinion

Snipes v. Dexter Gin Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1941No. 4595PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICE, Chief Justice.

The action: To recover the equivalent of the proceeds of a government subsidy check and sixteen bales of cotton. The question: Which of two claimants had the superior right to the property mentioned ? The facts:

The appellant contracted in writing to sell and convey to one Gentry certain real estate in consideration of a cash payment of $3,000, the assumption of an existing mortgage note due the United States of $3,500 secured by the property, sold, balance in fifteen annual payments of $1,500 each represented by fifteen promissory notes due one each year during fifteen…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sewell v. . UnderhillNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Killebrew v. . HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. B. Kuppenheimer & Co. v. MorninCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  4. Lynch v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Smedley v. SpeckmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ortiz v. LaneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Reserve Plan, Inc. v. PetersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. First National Bank v. Berger Briggs Real Estate & InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Goggins v. Dexter Gin Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Hesselden v. KarmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API