Legal Opinion · Dissent

Federal Land Bank v. McCloud

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1933No. 5787Published

1Dissent

MORGAN, J.,

Dissenting. — This is an action to recover possession of certain clover and alfalfa seed, or for its value if possession cannot be had, and the right to maintain it depends upon ownership of the seed. The following pertinent facts, in addition to those quoted from the contract in the foregoing opinion, also appear therein: The land consists of 320 acres; the agreed purchase price was $18,488.48, which was to bear interest at five and one-half per cent per annum. The contract contains the following further provisions: ,

‘'‘If at the end of the fourth year from date of this contract,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lynch v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Moen v. LillestalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bertleson v. Van Deusen Bros.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. First National Bank of Tulare v. AndreasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API