General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Lund
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.
In this action respondent (plaintiff below) seeks to recover possession of a certain automobile.' Ownership and right of possession are alleged. Judgment is asked for possession of the property or for its value if delivery cannot be had.
The answer admits the corporate existence of respondent, denies its ownership or right of possession of the property in question. The value is claimed to be different from that stated in the complaint. As a separate defense it is alleged *249that the respondent is a foreign corporation; that it has not complied with the provisions of the statutes of this state…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- George R. Barse Live Stock Co. v. Range Valley Cattle Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1897
- A. Booth & Co. v. WeigandUtah Supreme Court · 1906
- Home Brewing Co. v. American Chemical & Ozokerite Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by12 opinions
- Anglo-California Trust Co. v. HallUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Jones v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Dunn v. Utah Serum Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1925
- Battle Creek Bread Wrapping MacH. Co. v. Paramount Baking Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1934
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Shadyside Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.