United States v. United States Currency in the Sum of Six Hundred Sixty Thousand, Two Hundred Dollars
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order
AZRACK, United States Magistrate Judge.
On April 6, 2006, I entered an Order 1 granting Samy Khalil (“Claimant”) and Abdel Soliman’s motion to enforce a settlement agreement. See United States v. United States Currency in the Sum of Six Hundred Sixty Thousand, Two Hundred Dollars ($660,200.00), More or Less, 423 F.Supp.2d 14 (E.D.N.Y.2006) (hereinafter “Currency I”). At that time, I also granted Khalil and Soliman’s motion for costs and attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), because the government was not substantially justified…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Marie Lucie Jean v. Alan C. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Caplash v. NielsenDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- United States v. Certain Real PropertyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2008
- Berry v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Safranek v. WormuthDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024