Legal Opinion
DOES I THROUGH III v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 7, 2009No. Civil Action 01-02398 (HHK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR., District Judge.
Jane Doe I, by her next friend, Duery Felton, Personal Representative of the Estate of Jane Doe II, and Linda Tarlow, Personal Representative of the Estate of Jane Doe III (collectively, “plaintiffs”) bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the District of Columbia and the District’s Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Administration (“MRDDA”) (collectively, the “District of Columbia”) alleging that while Jane Doe I, Jane Doe II, and Jane Doe III were in the District of Columbia’s care, the District of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DOES I THROUGH III v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Doe Ex Rel. Tarlow v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Jane Doe I v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Jane Doe I v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016