Legal Opinion
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Caldwell
Texas Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 1991No. D-0566PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOK, Justice.
In this discovery mandamus, we consider the duration of the attorney work product privilege. Relator Owens-Coming Fiberglas Corporation was ordered by Respondent, the Honorable Neil Caldwell, to produce some 11,000 pages of documents which Owens-Coming alleges are privileged. Owens-Coming requested mandamus relief from this order of the trial court, and the court of appeals, without opinion, denied the motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus. We conditionally grant the writ.
Owens-Coming was sued in Brazoria County in two asbestos personal injury actions. 1…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Boatland of Houston, Inc. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Axelson, Inc. v. McIlhanyTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Ginsberg v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Humphreys v. CaldwellTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Republic Insurance Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- National Tank Co. v. BrothertonTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- in Re National Lloyds Insurance Company, Wardlaw Claims Service, Inc. and Ideal Adjusting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.