Legal Opinion

Stouch v. Brothers of the Order of Hermits

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-7055PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GILES, District Judge.

Warren William Stouch (“Stouch”) brings this action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and pendent state law claims. Defendants have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the motion of defendant Villanova University (“Villanova”) is granted, and the motion of defendants Brothers of the Order of Hermits of St. Augustine (“the . Brothers”) and Reverend William A. McGuire (“McGuire) is granted in part and denied in part.

I. STANDARD FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Summary judgment is to be granted only “if the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jordan v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Kurdyla v. Pinkerton SecurityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  3. Guinan v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of IndianapolisDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
  4. Kellam v. Snelling Personnel ServicesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1994
  5. Jean Anderson Hierarchy of Agents v. Allstate Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API