Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Skagit County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1922No. 16930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages against the defendant county because it had paid out money on a road contract which the plaintiff claimed was to its prejudice. There are other defendants, but the principal controversy was between the plaintiff and the county. The trial resulted in a judgment adverse to the contention of the plaintiff, and it appeals.

The facts necessary to present the questions for determination may be summarized as follows: On August 27,1917, the respondent, Skagit county, entered into a contract with T. L. Grant and L. P. Ervig, copartners under the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Puget Sound State Bank v. GallucciWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Northwestern National Bank v. Guardian Casualty & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Washington National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State ex rel. Bartelt v. LiebesWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  5. First National Bank v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of MontesanoWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State Bank of Wheatland v. TurpenWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Stubbs Electric Co. v. Longview School District No. 112Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Building Materials, Inc. v. Electric Equipment & Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API