Legal Opinion
Stubbs Electric Co. v. Longview School District No. 112
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1929No. 21827. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
By this action, the plaintiff sought subrogation to the rights of the Fidelity and Casualty Company against the defendant school district, and a money judgment against the district. To the complaint, a demurrer was interposed and sustained. The plaintiff refused to plead further, and elected to stand upon its complaint. Judgment was entered dismissing the action,.from which the plaintiff appeals.
The facts, as they appear in the complaint, essential to be stated, are these: June 30, 1926, "W. A. Hammond entered into a contract with Longview school district No. 112 of Cowlitz county, by which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reid v. PaulyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Denham v. Pioneer Sand & Gravel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of MontesanoWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Inland-Ryerson Construction Products Co. v. Brazier Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Longview School District No. 112 v. Stubbs Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- Martha Maytag Dannerbeck v. Oscar C. Palmer, Sr., Al A. Marth, Trustee in Bankruptcyof Pete Horner Excavating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- People v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932