Legal Opinion
Leisure Caviar, LLC v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 19, 2010No. 09-6228PublishedCited by 350 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
Leisure Caviar, a wholesale dealer of paddlefish roe, and Bemka Corporation, a buyer of paddlefish roe, challenge the district court’s denial of their Rule 59 motion to alter or amend the order dismissing their suit against the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and two of its employees. They also challenge the rejection of their post-dismissal Rule 15 motion to revise their amended complaint. Because the plaintiffs have not shown that any “newly discovered evidence” was “previously unavailable,” GenCorp, Inc. v. Am. Int'l Underwriters, 178 F.3d 804, 834 (6th…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Intera Corporation v. George Henderson IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Sidney Morse v. R. Clayton McWhorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Pittston Coal Group v. SebbenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by350 opinions
- Kareem Garrett v. Wexford HealthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- HDC, LLC v. City of Ann ArborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Melissa Brumley v. United Parcel Serv.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Lawrence Glazer v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Puckett v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
345 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.