Legal Opinion
Gondek v. Neal
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 18, 1976No. Docket 22966PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
We confront yet another case which requires that this Court supply key missing pieces to a legislative puzzle called the Subdivision Control Act of 1967, MCLA 560.101 et seq.; MSA 26.430(101) et seq. We have previously encountered confusion in this act and must conclude, again, that "these provisions emerged prematurely from the legislative drafting process”. Feldman v Monroe Township Board, 51 Mich App 752, 755; 216 NW2d 628 (1974).
The precise question we must face is the placement and the severity of the burden of proof in a proceeding brought to vacate all or part of a recorded plat. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Feldman v. Monroe Township BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Westveer v. AinsworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Binkley v. AsireMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Bangle v. State TreasurerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- First National Bank v. MichaelsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tomecek v. BavasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hall v. HansonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Hall v. HansonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Brookshire-Big Tree Ass'n v. Onieda TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Brookshire-Big Tree Ass'n v. Onieda TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.