Westveer v. Ainsworth
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFead, C. J.
This is review of an order denying the vacation of a plat, except in small part.
In 1886 the West Michigan Park Association, owner, recorded a plat of the premises, providing 150 lots, and designating the balance as parks, streets, etc. Each lot was adjacent to a park. The property consisted of sand dunes with some wild grass, shrubs and trees upon them. Its value lay in summer home purposes. The owner sold most of the lots, describing them in the deeds of conveyances by reference to the recorded plat.
Through foreclosure of mortgage, given in 1889, foreclosure of a levy made in 1891,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pulcifer v. BishopMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Diamond Match Co. v. Village of OntonagonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- In Re OakesMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Conkling v. Village of Mackinaw CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kirchen v. RemengaMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- WEST MICHIGAN PARK ASSN. v. Department of ConservationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Schurtz v. WescottMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Feldman v. Monroe Township BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Little v. HirschmanMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.