First National Bank v. Michaels
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtR. L. Smith, J.
This is an action to vacate a plat. The trial court granted the relief prayed for and we reverse. The plaintiffs do not represent "2/3 of the proprietors collectively, of the platted land, who also own 2/3 by area of that land”. Thus, under the rule of Feldman v Monroe Township Board, 51 Mich App 752; 216 NW2d 628 (1974), lv den 391 Mich 837 (1974), the petitioners lack standing to maintain this action.
Speaking only for myself I wish to add a few words of explanation. I reluctantly vote to reverse because I am unable to convince my brothers that Feldman should be repudiated. While the Supreme…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Malooly v. York Heating & Ventilating Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re Petition of BryantMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Feldman v. Monroe Township BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- In Re Petition of HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- In Re Hendricks to Vacate StreetMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tomecek v. BavasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Gondek v. NealMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- In Re Vacation of Plat of Mollie Britton EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Tomecek v. BavasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007