Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. Stewartstown Development Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 9, 1994PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In this action to recover on an express contract to do excavation work, the trial court instructed the jury, without any request therefor, that even if there were no contract, the excavation contractor could recover on the basis of quantum meruit. The owner, against whom the jury returned a verdict, contends that this was error. We agree. Therefore, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

In June, 1987, Wayne E. Schaefer, t/d/b/a Schaefer’s Excavating (Schaefer), contracted to do excavation work for a development project owned by Stewartstown Development Company (Stewartstown).…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hawthorne v. Dravo Corp., Keystone Div.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Lach v. Fleth, Admr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. McKEE BY McKEE v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Hrivnak v. PerroneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Rizzo v. MichenerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mount Olivet Tabernacle Church v. Edwin L. Wiegand DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Cruz v. Northeastern HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Rittenhouse v. HanksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. King v. StefenelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Choma v. IyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API