Legal Opinion

Lach v. Fleth, Admr.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1949No. Appeal, 16PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,

Plaintiff brought an action of assumpsit against the administrator of the estate of Minnie B. Potter, deceased, for services which he claimed he performed for her from August 21, 1930, until the date of her death on February 22, 1945; Mrs. Potter’s son, Ralph, died on August 21, 1930. Mrs. Potter was a widow. At the time of Ralph’s death he was engaged to a woman who later married a man named Hafner. She appears in this case as Mrs. Irene Hafner, a witness. It is claimed that after Ralph Potter’s funeral on August 21, 1930, Mrs. Potter asked Max Lach to enter…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hertzog v. HertzogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  2. Weinglass v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Western Show Co., Inc. v. MixSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Kauss v. RohnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Cramer v. McKinneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Kaczkowski v. BolubaszSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Betterman v. American Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Shafer Electric & Construction v. MantiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Smail v. FlockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Martin v. Little, Brown and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API