Rittenhouse v. Hanks
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, P.J.:
¶ 1 Gerald E. Hanks, M.D., and American Oncological Hospital of the Fox Chase Cancer Center (collectively “Appellants”) appeal the judgment entered against them in this medical malpractice action. We affirm.
¶ 2 Appellee, Ruth S. Rittenhouse, ad-ministratrix of the estate of her husband John Rittenhouse, brought this action alleging the negligence of Dr. Hanks, John’s attending physician, Dr. Anthony D’Amico, a resident, and their employer Fox Chase. A nonsuit was entered in favor of Dr. D’Amico. As to Dr. Hanks, however, the jury found he was negligent and that his negligence…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. OhleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Von Der Heide v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Lira v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Rauch v. Mike-MayerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Corrado v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Williams v. SyedCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Keller v. Feasterville Family Health Care CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Carlino, S. v. Ethicon, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.