Legal Opinion

Rittenhouse v. Hanks

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 16, 2001PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, P.J.:

¶ 1 Gerald E. Hanks, M.D., and American Oncological Hospital of the Fox Chase Cancer Center (collectively “Appellants”) appeal the judgment entered against them in this medical malpractice action. We affirm.

¶ 2 Appellee, Ruth S. Rittenhouse, ad-ministratrix of the estate of her husband John Rittenhouse, brought this action alleging the negligence of Dr. Hanks, John’s attending physician, Dr. Anthony D’Amico, a resident, and their employer Fox Chase. A nonsuit was entered in favor of Dr. D’Amico. As to Dr. Hanks, however, the jury found he was negligent and that his negligence…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. OhleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Von Der Heide v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Lira v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rauch v. Mike-MayerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Corrado v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Williams v. SyedCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Keller v. Feasterville Family Health Care CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Carlino, S. v. Ethicon, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API