Legal Opinion

Dubitzky v. Liquor Control Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 8, 1970PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, C. J.

The plaintiff is the owner of premises at 35 Burnside Avenue in the town of East Hartford. On January 3, 1969, he applied to the liquor control commission for a druggist liquor permit for the premises. On April 28, 1969, following a hearing, the commission denied the application on the ground that “[t]he Commission finds the granting of a Druggist Liquor Permit at this location would be in violation of the zoning ordinance of the Town of East Hartford.” The plaintiff appealed to the Court of Common Pleas and the town of East Hartford intervened as a party defendant. The court sustained the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Town of Darien v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Ullman, State's Attorney, Ex Rel. Eramo v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  3. Lehmaier v. WadsworthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  4. Town of West Hartford v. WillettsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  5. Cusano v. DunnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Point O'Woods Assn., Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Blum v. Lisbon Leasing CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. Essex Leasing, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Friedson v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. City of Minot v. FisherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API