Legal Opinion
Midland Insurance v. Universal Technology, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 29, 1986No. 12569PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
In this action the plaintiff Midland Insurance Company (hereinafter Midland), sought to recover earned premiums for an insurance policy affording coverage to the defendant Universal Technology, Inc. (hereinafter Universal), against product liability and malpractice claims arising from the use by beauticians of depilation equipment manufactured by Universal. The trial court rendered judgment for Universal in accordance with the report of a state attorney referee, Norman K. Parsells, who had been appointed pursuant to General Statutes § 52-434 (a) (4). On appeal Midland has attacked the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Century Insurance Agency, Inc. v. City Commerce Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Jensen's, Inc. v. Town of KillingworthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Stevens Insurance, Inc. v. HowellsMontana Supreme Court · 1970
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gargano v. HeymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Rostenberg-Doern Co. v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Tarka v. FilipovicConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Christ-Janer v. A.F. Conte & Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.