Legal Opinion

Boice v. Palmer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1898No. 8153PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from the district court of Sarpy county. Tried .below before Blair, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

On February 21, 1894, Patrick Boice caused to be sold at public sale at his farm in Sarpy county certain of his property and stock, among the latter a jack. The jack was purchased by Jacob Palmer. In the district court of that county Palmer subsequently sued Boice, alleging that before he bid for and purchased said jack Boice represented to Mm that the jack was sound, all right, and a sure foal-getter; that, relying upon these representations, he purchased the jack and paid for him the sum of $445; that the representations made by Boice were false; that the jack was then and there…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Olive v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Preuit v. PeopleNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Dixon v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Murphey v. VirginNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. First National Bank v. CarsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Landrum v. RoddyNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Loyal's Auto Exchange, Inc. v. MunchNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Swengil v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Southwell v. De BoerNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Hauber v. LeiboldNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API