Legal Opinion

Murphey v. Virgin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1896No. 6211PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from the district court of Seward county. Tried below before Wheeler, J. References: Mathewson v. Burr, 6 Neb., 312; Gommings v. Winters, 19 Neb., 720; Holland v. Griffith, 13 Neb., 472; Sandtoich Mfg.

Read the full summary

Error from the district court of Seward county. Tried below before Wheeler, J. References: Mathewson v. Burr, 6 Neb., 312; Gommings v. Winters, 19 Neb., 720; Holland v. Griffith, 13 Neb., 472; Sandtoich Mfg. Go. v. Fcary, 22 Neb., 53; Hiatt v. Kinlcaid, 28 Neb.,-721; Galloioay v. Hides, 26 Neb., 532; City Bank of Macon v. Kent, 57 G-a., 283; Smith v. Grimes, 43 la., 356; Rockford R. Go. v. Coultars, 67 111., 398; Lincoln v. Holms, 20 Neb., 39; Campbell v. Holland, 22 Neb., 587; Parsons v. Hughes, 9 Paige [N. Y.], 591; Adams v. Sage, 28 N. Y., 103; Baker v. Spencer, 47 N. Y., 562; Pearsoli v.…

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

• The defendant in error was the plaintiff in the district court, and in her petition charged that Murphey, on or about August 3, 1889, assaulted her and took from her possession gold and silver coin of the amount and value of $463, — her money, — and converted the same to his own use. The. defense set up was that Murphey had been a surety on the official bond of Alexander Virgin, plaintiff’s husband, as.treasurer of a school district; that judgment .was recovered on the bond for $1,292, and that Murphey, by virtue of said judgment and at the request of Mrs. Virgin, paid upon said…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Moore v. First Nat. Bank of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Pahl v. SpragueNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Travis Glass Co. v. IbbetsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Davin v. DowlingWashington Supreme Court · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API