Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1895No. 6826PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to the district court for York county. Tried below before Bates, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

The plaintiff in error was convicted on an information charging him under section 6, Criminal Code, of having in York county on the 22d day of June, 1893, employed in and upon the body and womb of a woman named in the information a certain instrument with intent unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously to destroy a vitalized embryo— in other words, of producing an abortion. -Several of the assignments of error go in effect to the sufficiency of the evidence, and by considering this question here a detailed consideration of some other assignments will be rendered unnecessary. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Carleton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Walrath v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Hart v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Parke v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. May v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  3. State v. DeGroatSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  4. State v. ReillyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Lamb v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API