Legal Opinion
Mary P. Dahl-Eimers v. Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 9, 1993No. 92-2904PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Circuit Judge:
The issue before this Court is whether the district court correctly denied Plaintiff-Appellant Mary P. Dahl-Eimers’ application for a preliminary injunction. Dahl-Eimers has advanced breast cancer, and she wants Defendant-Appellee Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance Company to pay for high dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplant (HDC-ABMT) under their major medical expense insurance contract. Mutual of Omaha refused to provide coverage for HDQ-ABMT because the company considers it experimental and therefore not medically necessary. The insurance policy covers…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- E. Remy Martin & Co., S.A. v. Shaw-Ross International Imports, Inc., and Roger Myers D/B/A F. Remy & CieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Excelsior Ins. Co. v. Pomona Park Bar & Package StoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. PridgenSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Sofarelli v. Pinellas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Richard H. Heasley, Sr. And Doris G. Heasley v. Belden & Blake CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Lafarge Corporation v. Travelers Indemnity Co., Appalachian Insurance Company, Northbrook Insurance Company, First State Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Hyman v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.