Legal Opinion

Boundary Dispute Between Lots 97 & 98 of the C.M. Bost Estate v. R.L. Wallace Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 1, 2009No. COA08-1453PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ELMORE, Judge.

This case arose as a result of a dispute regarding the location of the boundary line that runs between land owned by Anderson/Griffin Properties (petitioner) and R.L. Wallace Construction Company, J. M. Barrett, and Sheree T. Barrett (together, respondents). Petitioner appeals from the judgment entered in a bench trial by the Superior Court of Cabarrus County. The trial court adjudged the line as proposed by respondents to be the true boundary line between petitioner’s and respondents’ properties. For the reasons herein, we affirm.

I

Petitioner owns lot 97 and respondents own lot…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Shear v. Stevens Building Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Lagies v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adelman v. GanttCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API