Legal Opinion

Miles v. Dorn

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 18, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Caldwell County. Tried below before Hon. Jno. H. Gambrell.

1Opinion of the Court

The case will be reversed on account of the error presented in appellant's second assignment. Kleinsmith's right as to a one-fourth interest in the cotton should have been submitted to the jury. We understand from what is stated in the record upon this subject that Kleinsmith recovered a judgment against Mrs. Johnson for the value of eight bales of cotton, including the two bales in controversy, in a suit against her in the nature of a conversion. This judgment was paid off and discharged by Mrs. Johnson. It appears that Kleinsmith's interest in the cotton amounted to a one-fourth. When Mrs.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moore, McKinney & Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  2. Rentfrow v. Lancaster & TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Curlee v. RoganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. DoeringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Williams v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API