Moore, McKinney & Co. v. King
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the County Court of McCulloch.
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Chief Justice.
We have carefully considered all the questions presented by the various assignments of error, and conclude that there is no error in the judgment of the court below, and it is therefore affirmed.
There is one question presented in the record that we deem important to discuss. The action is for damages for the wrongful conversion of a. wagon, the property of the appellee. The jury, by their verdict, found $100 as actual damages.
In addition to an item of exemplary damages, the petition laid the claim for actual damages at the value of the wagon and its use up to the time of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- H. F. & E. D. Craddock v. GoodwinTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Ewing v. BlountSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- Hair v. LittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
- Schley v. LyonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
- McDonald v. NorthNew York Supreme Court · 1867
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ward v. OdemCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Lone Star Finance Corp. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Field v. MunsterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Ford Motor Co. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Montgomery v. GallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.