Smith v. Duluth Log Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Actions in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $680.-07, and to obtain and foreclose a lien for the same upon certain logs. Plaintiffs attached certain ties, logs, etc. Defendant moved to vacate the attachments and set aside the returns on the ground that the purported levies and returns were unauthorized and void. The motions were denied, Cant, J. From the order denying defendant’s motion, it appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
These several actions were brought to foreclose certain alleged log liens under the provisions of section 3524, et seq., R. L. 1905. Defendant Duluth Log Company moved the court below to vacate the writ of attachment issued in the action, and to quash and set aside the sheriff’s return thereof, upon the ground that the purported service of the writ and the levy thereunder were insufficient to vest the court with jurisdiction of the action. The motion was denied, and defendant appealed.
Section 3524 gives to those who perform labor or render services in or about the cutting, hauling, or driving…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Woodward v. SartwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Guarantee Co. of North America v. First National Bank of LynchburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- Breault v. Merrill & Ring Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Horton v. MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Millett v. BlakeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.