Horton v. Monroe
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo. (Buck, J.) Ejectment. Defendant brings erroi*. Beversed. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
This is ejectment.. The defendant, upon *197the trial, made title to the premises in question through a sheriffs sale that had been made by virtue of a judgment in a suit commenced by attachment against one Hurd, who was published in under How. Stat. § 8003, and:. who quitclaimed to the plaintiff. Plaintiff insists that the attachment proceedings are void by reason of certain jurisdictional defects, which will be taken up in the order presented.
1. That the affidavit for the writ was sworn to July 25, and was not filed until July 27. The statute provides that the affidavit shall not be deemed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Knowles v. The Gaslight and Coke CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Ritter v. ScannellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Johnson v. MossNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Colton v. RupertMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- P. J. Willis & Bro. v. Mooring & BlanchardTexas Supreme Court · 1885
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Brown v. StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- Himmelberger-Harrison Lumber Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Lemieux v. LincolnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Smith v. Duluth Log Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912